flowarchitectures_summary

Summary of “Flow Architectures: The Future of Streaming and Event-Driven Integration” by James Urquhart

Flow Architectures Overview

James Urquhart’s “Flow Architectures” explores the future of software integration through streaming and event-driven systems. The book outlines a vision where real-time data exchange becomes inexpensive and nearly instantaneous, transforming economic processes and institutional collaboration.

Core Concepts

• Flow and Integration: Flow refers to the continuous, real-time communication of system states, akin to water flowing in a river. This concept is central to the evolution of digital economies, where data drives economic activity.
• Event-Driven Architectures: These architectures are gaining popularity as they facilitate seamless communication between distributed systems, enhancing the speed and efficiency of data processing.

Business Implications

• Drivers for Adoption: The adoption of flow architectures is driven by the need to improve customer experiences, organizational efficiency, and foster innovation.
• Economic Impact: The integration of flow systems could lead to a “Cambrian explosion” of economic activity, where organizations can execute numerous integrations quickly, encouraging economic experimentation.

Technological Foundations

• Current Technologies: The book examines existing technologies like service buses, message queues, and Internet of Things (IoT) protocols that contribute to flow architectures.
• Emerging Technologies: Future developments in flow systems will likely involve advancements in security, agility, and manageability, with a focus on reducing latency and enhancing edge computing.

Strategic Frameworks

• Wardley Mapping and Promise Theory: These frameworks are used to analyze the evolution of flow components and predict technological trends, helping organizations prepare for future disruptions.

Challenges and Opportunities

• Security and Agility: Ensuring secure, agile systems is crucial as flow architectures evolve. The book discusses patterns like the Collector, Distributor, and Signal patterns to address these challenges.
• Scalability: Flow systems must be scalable to handle increasing data volumes and integrate seamlessly across various platforms.

Future Vision

Urquhart envisions a future where flow architectures create a “World Wide Flow,” linking global activities much like the World Wide Web connects information. This shift will democratize access to technologies and services, fostering exponential innovation through machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Call to Action

The book encourages technologists and decision-makers to embrace the potential of flow architectures, preparing for a future where these systems are mainstream. By understanding and leveraging these technologies, organizations can gain competitive advantages and drive transformative change.

Conclusion

“Flow Architectures” is a forward-looking exploration of how streaming and event-driven integration will reshape technology and economic landscapes. Urquhart provides insights into the necessary technological components and strategic approaches to harness the power of flow systems, urging readers to anticipate and adapt to forthcoming innovations.

Summary of “The 10-Year Impact of the World Wide Flow”

Introduction

The book discusses the transformative impact of the Internet Event Flow Suite (IEFS), introduced in 2021, on various industries over a decade. IEFS, comprising the Event Metadata Protocol (EMP) and Event Subscription Interface (ESI), standardized data streams, significantly influencing finance, retail, transportation, healthcare, and data services.

Finance

Financial services quickly adopted IEFS, enabling real-time budget management and central banking reporting. The “Real-Time Economy” initiative allowed banks to adjust risk analysis dynamically. Equities markets benefited from reduced costs in accessing data streams, leading to a rise in hobbyist trading and AI-driven financial services. However, some algorithms failed, like the Komputrade Crash of 2023. Success stories include Neuroquity, acquired by JPMorgan Chase for $34 billion.

Retail

IEFS improved real-time inventory management across supply chains, leading to standardized systems from companies like SAP and Amazon. Retailers benefited from mobile assistants and in-store location tracking, enhancing the personal shopping assistant experience. Online grocery stores optimized delivery routes and product recommendations using real-time data.

Transportation

IEFS facilitated advancements in the transportation sector. Tesla’s SelfCharging technology automated battery management, integrating self-driving and charging systems. The logistics industry developed efficient load-brokering marketplaces, exemplified by LoadLeader, acquired by FedEx, which optimized cargo space utilization.

Healthcare

IEFS revolutionized healthcare by connecting fitness devices to health tracking systems. Kaiser Permanente and Epic enabled real-time health monitoring. Personal health record providers emerged, giving patients control over their data. Hospitals automated supply management, while pharmaceutical companies used streams for drug efficacy monitoring, reducing fatalities by 72%.

Data Services

The proliferation of real-time data streams extended beyond specific industries. Streams for tracking various activities and metrics, such as weather conditions, became integral. The National Weather Service’s WeatherFlow streams provided up-to-the-minute global weather updates, demonstrating the critical role of real-time data in national infrastructure.

Conclusion

The widespread adoption of IEFS transformed industries by enabling seamless data flow and integration, leading to innovative services and efficiencies across sectors. The book highlights both the successes and challenges faced over the decade, showcasing the profound impact of standardized data protocols on the global economy.

The World Wide Flow (WWF) has significantly impacted various sectors, offering both opportunities and challenges. Major consumers include transportation and logistics companies, which use WWF to mitigate disruptions caused by adverse weather. The technology is also utilized by air traffic control systems for efficient routing and by consumer businesses like LiveTime Games to enhance virtual reality experiences. Many Global 2000 companies leverage WWF for data services to improve efficiency and innovate new market solutions.

However, the WWF’s impact hasn’t been entirely positive. The democratization of real-time data has led to job losses, particularly in clerical roles, contributing to the 2026 recession. Governments have attempted to address this by encouraging skill development and gig economy participation, leading to the rise of “flowtrepreneurs.” Despite these efforts, income inequality remains largely unchanged.

Security concerns have plagued WWF, with early vulnerabilities like “man-in-the-middle” attacks affecting financial systems. Technologies from companies like ProviCorp have improved data security, but international spying scandals persist, highlighting ongoing trust issues. Social media platforms like Twitter adopted WWF for content streaming, but this has led to increased advertising and subscription models. The pornography industry’s misuse of WWF for illegal content has necessitated specialized law enforcement teams to combat illicit streams.

WWF has influenced government policy, with debates on tax structures and increased internet monitoring. The IRS is exploring a federal sales tax prototype using WWF data, reflecting its technical feasibility. The future of WWF promises continued evolution with innovations in self-driving cars, smart infrastructure, and integrated cities. Network providers face challenges in supporting data volumes, potentially leading to tiered pricing and private networks.

The concept of “flow” represents a shift towards real-time, event-driven data integration, characterized by standard interfaces and protocols. Flow allows consumers to request data streams from producers, who control the data transmission. This integration is crucial for applications like contact tracing and resource distribution, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Flow interaction, the processing of data streams, is essential for deriving value from this integration.

Flow’s potential lies in reducing costs and fostering innovation by enabling seamless data sharing across organizations. It promises to transform real-time cooperation and business operations, paving the way for new opportunities in the digital economy.

Summary

Event streams are a method of transmitting a series of events between producers and consumers, focusing on contextually enriched data to simplify consumer understanding. Unlike raw data streams, event streams include contextual information, allowing for more efficient integration across organizational boundaries. This integration is crucial as our economic system increasingly digitizes and automates value exchanges, such as information and money.

Currently, most cross-organizational integrations are not real-time and rely on proprietary formats, often involving batch processing with inherent delays. APIs exist for real-time streaming, but they are typically proprietary, limiting widespread adoption. Real-time integration remains expensive and complex, reserved for critical data exchanges.

A shift to well-known mechanisms for event stream creation and consumption could democratize real-time integration. Standardized protocols would allow developers to easily publish, find, and subscribe to event streams, reducing costs and fostering innovation. This approach requires asynchronous, adaptable, and extensible flow architectures, where consumers can connect and disconnect without impacting producers.

Flow architectures offer immense opportunities for innovation by enabling the combination of disparate data streams. For example, integrating smart city sensor data with personal biometrics could enhance health insights. Similarly, combining weather and traffic data could optimize logistics. The potential applications are vast, limited only by the creativity of developers and entrepreneurs.

The evolution of flow architectures could lead to a “World Wide Flow” (WWF), a global network of activity data akin to the World Wide Web. This would democratize data distribution and enable scalable automation, intertwining with the web to enhance global connectivity.

Event-driven architectures (EDAs) are pivotal in this evolution, allowing decoupled, real-time data exchange without predefined consumer-producer relationships. EDAs use events to complete tasks, providing a composable approach to building data streams. This contrasts with contextual architectures, which require specific knowledge of integration points.

While real-time data exchange exists today, it often involves proprietary interfaces. The future of flow lies in creating open, standardized systems that facilitate seamless, low-cost integration across industries, driving innovation and efficiency.

High-frequency trading (HFT) systems are integral to modern stock exchanges like NASDAQ and NYSE, relying on low-latency architectures for success. These systems, which account for 10-40% of global equities trades, enhance market liquidity but also introduce volatility. HFTs utilize automated algorithms to capitalize on trading opportunities faster than human traders by being physically hosted in exchange data centers to minimize latency. Connections between HFT systems and exchanges are not self-service; they require pre-negotiated, dedicated network setups, contrasting with more flexible, API-driven systems like Twitter’s PowerTrack API.

Twitter’s PowerTrack API allows users to filter and consume data streams, such as tweets, for various analyses. It represents a more flexible model where developers can create and destroy connections at will, unlike the constant connections in stock market feeds. This flexibility is attributed to the time sensitivity of stock feeds, where microseconds matter, versus Twitter’s acceptable standard internet speeds.

The concept of “flow” architecture aims to reduce the friction in establishing connections by enabling a more fluid interaction model. Serverless programming, exemplified by AWS Lambda, is pivotal in this shift, allowing developers to run code without managing servers, triggered by real-time events. This model minimizes operational setup, offers scalability, and aligns with the flow architecture by linking functions to event producers.

The book explores the inevitability of flow adoption due to its benefits for businesses, including improved customer experience, operational efficiency, and innovation. Flow architectures lower costs, increase flexibility, and offer more choices, driving digital transformation. The text outlines a roadmap for understanding and implementing flow, including Wardley Mapping for situational awareness and exploring event-driven systems like IoT and message queues.

Future chapters will delve into the evolution of flow components, the role of open-source solutions, and integration patterns that will influence real-time event processing. Institutions are encouraged to prepare for integrating into the World Wide Flow (WWF) by adopting practices that leverage rapid experimentation. The book concludes with an appendix surveying products and services that support flow evolution, providing insights into the future landscape of event-driven architectures.

Summary

Customer Experience and Personalization

A Salesforce survey highlights that 82% of business buyers expect the same personalized experience from vendors as they receive from consumer retailers, with 72% demanding tailored engagement. Organizations must ensure seamless, enjoyable, and consistent interactions by sharing data across applications and services in real-time. Failing to provide such experiences can result in lost sales opportunities and diminished trust.

Timely Consistency Across Sectors

Timely consistency is crucial across various sectors, including academia and emergency relief. Organizations must adapt to changes swiftly, ensuring data is shared reliably and in real-time. This is especially challenging when data sharing occurs between different entities, necessitating robust software and infrastructure.

Organizational Efficiency and Digital Solutions

Organizations strive to enhance efficiency, with businesses focusing on profit and nonprofits on impact. Digital solutions are increasingly used to improve worker productivity and data-driven processes. Value stream mapping is a key tool for identifying constraints in process flow, aiming to reduce lead time (LT) and process time (PT) by eliminating bottlenecks.

Event-Driven Integration and Flow

Event-driven integration is vital for improving data flow and reducing LT and PT. Software can automate tasks 24/7, prioritizing work efficiently. Automation platforms often use rules engines, though AI and machine learning are gradually taking over. Interoperability between systems is essential, requiring shared interfaces and protocols to reduce connection costs.

Innovation and Experimentation

Innovation, distinct from mere adaptation, is crucial for creating new value and gaining competitive advantage. Digital transformation is often necessary for survival but does not equate to innovation. Flow, with its interoperability, facilitates new business models and solutions, driving innovation through network effects.

Network Effects and the World Wide Web Analogy

Flow’s potential mirrors the World Wide Web’s growth, where increased utility and market interest create a positive feedback loop. As more businesses and consumers adopt flow, new technologies and solutions emerge, attracting further participants. This cycle of innovation and value generation is akin to the web’s evolution, with flow poised to experience similar transformative effects.

Conclusion

Organizations must prioritize personalized, consistent customer experiences and leverage digital solutions to improve efficiency. Event-driven integration and flow can significantly enhance data processing, leading to innovation and competitive advantage. As flow adoption grows, it is expected to create substantial new value, similar to the impact of the World Wide Web.

AWS’s EventBridge is revolutionizing stream processing by providing a standard method for connecting live event streams from various SaaS providers. This has increased the adoption of AWS services like Lambda and Kinesis, as businesses leverage event-driven solutions to address key challenges. As stream options expand, developers seek easier ways to discover, connect, and process streams, leading to the development of common abstractions and standard flow interfaces.

Key qualities driving flow adoption include reducing stream processing costs, enhancing data flow flexibility, and fostering a rich market ecosystem. Lower integration costs are crucial, as integration dominates IT budgets. Stream processing, when made more efficient through standard tools and methods, can fundamentally change integration economics, similar to the Jevons paradox where increased efficiency leads to greater overall consumption.

The standardization of tools will enable developers to focus on functional logic rather than protocol handling, driving faster feature implementation and innovation. As flow technology evolves, it will become more accessible, reducing labor costs and potentially allowing nontechnical users to perform integrations.

Economies of scale will further reduce costs as flow adoption grows, leading to new vendor offerings and optimizations in network configurations, cloud services, and stream monetization. This will make flow-related capabilities cheaper to implement as demand increases.

Flexibility in data flow design is essential for innovation and adaptation. Flow architectures will excel through composability, allowing developers to connect different processing systems in unanticipated ways. Unlike contextual tools, which limit adaptability, composable architectures enable dynamic integration and behavior change.

Interoperability is another critical aspect, allowing tools not explicitly designed to work together to connect predictably and usefully. This flexibility and interoperability will be foundational for the widespread adoption of flow technologies, enabling organizations to efficiently adapt to changing environments and maximize the value of timely data delivery.

Summary

Interoperability is crucial for the success of modern software systems, enabling seamless data exchange between producers and consumers. This concept allows for the integration of various services, such as financial data aggregation and mobile applications, by using common interfaces and protocols. The potential for interoperability to transform industries is significant, with standardized data formats facilitating low-cost data movement in sectors like healthcare.

However, interoperability also introduces challenges, such as security and privacy concerns, which need to be managed effectively. The complexity of interconnected systems can lead to vulnerabilities, as seen in financial crises. Despite these risks, the economic opportunities presented by interoperability are vast, driving investment to address these concerns.

Ecosystems play a vital role in leveraging interoperability, allowing companies to build upon core platforms and create value-added services. Successful ecosystems expand the utility of a platform, providing economic opportunities for both the core company and its partners. This model has been effective in industries like equities trading, where electronic data streams have transformed market operations.

For businesses to fully realize the benefits of flow, certain traits are essential: security, agility, timeliness, manageability, and memory. Secure and trusted data exchange is fundamental, while agility allows for adaptable connections. Timeliness ensures data is used effectively, manageability provides system oversight, and memory facilitates historical data analysis.

The adoption of flow will drive changes in how businesses operate, particularly in utilizing real-time data. This shift from batch processing to stream processing enables timely insights and actions, improving customer experience and operational efficiency. Industries such as retail, banking, and logistics can benefit from this transition, leading to innovative processes and business models.

Flow networks, characterized by composable and interoperable architectures, will significantly impact organizational structures. They will encourage entrepreneurship and innovation, reshaping how institutions and the economy function. The ability to quickly integrate and process data will create new opportunities and challenges, emphasizing the need for strategic management of these networks.

In summary, interoperability and flow offer transformative potential for industries by enabling efficient data exchange and fostering ecosystems. While challenges exist, the economic and innovative opportunities are substantial, driving the evolution of businesses and their integration strategies.

Summary of “Dealing with Darwin: How Great Companies Innovate at Every Phase of Their Evolution”

Geoffrey A. Moore’s work delves into the concept of “flow” in corporate structures, emphasizing the separation of core and context activities. Core activities differentiate a company from its competitors, while context activities do not. Companies that focus on enhancing core activities while minimizing investment in context tend to thrive in evolving markets. This separation allows for innovative outsourcing, enabling organizations to streamline operations and focus on their unique strengths.

Impact on Jobs and Expertise

The rise of flow and automation is reshaping job roles, particularly clerical positions. Clerks, traditionally responsible for repetitive tasks, are being replaced by automated systems. This shift is not necessarily negative, as it opens up opportunities for new expert roles that require creativity and adaptability. The evolution of machine learning and artificial intelligence further accelerates this change, potentially leading to the loss of certain professions but also the creation of new ones.

Flow and New Business Models

Flow impacts various industries by enhancing information flow and integration, leading to more efficient operations. In education, flow could revolutionize how skills and knowledge are tracked, creating a dynamic, up-to-date profile of individual capabilities. This concept, akin to a “LinkedIn for skills,” would allow for a centralized representation of one’s learning and experiences, benefiting employers and educational institutions alike.

Flow and Scale

The concept of flow aligns with Geoffrey West’s theories on allometric scaling, where systems evolve to optimize resource delivery. Companies and industries will likely develop around core data flows, with significant players emerging as data stream owners. This evolution will shape how businesses operate, with potential for collaboration and shared data access among companies.

Next Steps

To prepare for the future shaped by flow, companies need to understand its potential and position themselves accordingly. The book suggests using models like Wardley Mapping and Promise Theory to anticipate and adapt to these changes, ensuring readiness for the evolving economic and social landscape.

Overall, Moore’s insights highlight the transformative potential of flow in business, urging companies to focus on core strengths and adapt to technological advancements to remain competitive.

The text discusses the evolving landscape of Event-Driven Architectures (EDA) and introduces two modeling techniques, Wardley Mapping and Promise Theory, to understand and predict the future of technology integration. The focus is on creating “flow” within systems, where data is automatically pushed to consumers without active requests, maintaining control over transmission, and using standard network protocols.

Key Properties for Fluent Architectures:

1. Self-service Interfaces: Consumers request streams from producers.
2. Control and Autonomy: Producers decide which requests to fulfill.
3. Automatic Data Push: Information is pushed to consumers as available.
4. Standard Protocols: Data transmission uses standard network protocols.

Requirements for Fluent Architectures:

• Security: Control over data access and protection.
• Agility: Adaptation to changing environments and rapid response.
• Timeliness: Data delivery within relevant time frames.
• Memory: Ability to replay streams for memory creation.
• Manageability: Observability and operability for system behavior understanding.

Modeling Techniques:

• Wardley Mapping: A strategic tool to visualize and debate technology landscapes by identifying user needs, required components, and their evolutionary stages. It helps in understanding how technologies evolve from novel to commodity.

• Promise Theory: A framework to validate relationships between components by defining promises made by agents (entities) to each other. It emphasizes autonomy, where agents promise based on their behavior without external impositions.

Building a Flow Integration Value Chain:

1. Scope Definition: Establish a clear map scope, focusing on real-time integration via event-driven architectures.
2. User Needs and Components: Identify producers and consumers as users, with flow integration as the need. Determine components like interfaces and protocols essential for fulfilling this need.
3. Validation with Promise Theory: Validate relationships between components using promises, ensuring alignment toward the user need.

Conclusion:

The integration of Wardley Mapping and Promise Theory provides a robust framework for understanding and planning strategic technology evolution. By focusing on flow integration, organizations can better adapt to future technological changes and improve real-time data sharing across boundaries.

For further insights, the text recommends exploring Simon Wardley’s blog posts on Wardley Mapping and Mark Burgess’s book “Thinking in Promises” for a deeper understanding of Promise Theory.

Summary of Flow Integration and Interaction Components

Flow integration requires two key interfaces: logical connection and discovery. The logical connection interface allows consumers and producers to negotiate, establish, and manage access to a data stream. This involves authentication, subscription management, and termination. The physical connection, handled by infrastructure components, connects computing systems without direct management by consumers or producers.

The discovery interface helps identify available event streams, detailing their properties like data volume and protocols. It enables understanding of stream qualities, such as metadata format and required technologies, facilitating the connection between producers and consumers.

Protocols are critical for data exchange, comprising metadata and payload formats. The metadata format provides context, helping flow libraries understand payload formatting and encryption. The payload format specifies how data is transmitted for each event type, varying by use case but potentially standardized for common streams.

Interaction Components are essential for turning event streams into valuable insights. These include:

• Source: Devices or software that collect data, such as sensors or applications.
• Processor: Software that processes incoming data, possibly converting formats or triggering actions.
• Queue: Mechanisms for storing and forwarding data asynchronously, decoupling producers from consumers.
• Sink: Components that display, store, or utilize processed data, such as dashboards or databases.

Infrastructure supports these components, providing compute, storage, and networking resources. It includes physical connections and shared services necessary for flow interaction tasks.

Promises between components ensure seamless integration. Interfaces promise to locate and connect streams, while protocols ensure consistent data delivery. Interaction components promise data processing and storage, while infrastructure promises capacity and service availability.

Finally, the evolutionary state of each component is mapped using Wardley Mapping, which categorizes stages as Genesis, Custom Built, Product, and Commodity. This mapping helps understand technology development and predict future trends.

By integrating these components and understanding their interactions, flow integration can efficiently process and utilize data streams, creating value for both producers and consumers.

Summary

The text explores the process of mapping a value chain using Wardley Maps to understand the flow of components in a system. A Wardley Map is a strategic tool that represents components relative to their evolution and user needs. It features three key traits: an anchor (fixed orientation), meaningful position (relative placement of components), and consistency of movement (predictable progression of components).

Mapping the Value Chain

The mapping process involves categorizing components into users and user needs, flow integration components, interaction components, and infrastructure. Each component is placed on an evolutionary scale from Genesis to Commodity, which reflects its maturity and standardization.

1. Users and User Needs: These can be placed anywhere on the evolutionary axis, but their exact position often does not significantly change the map’s meaning. Exceptions occur when users are software systems, which may fit specific locations on the axis.

2. Flow Integration Components: These are defined by interfaces and protocols. While physical connection mechanisms like HTTP and WebSocket are commoditized, logical connections are still evolving. Discovery APIs are in the Genesis phase, indicating early development.

3. Interaction Components: Established technologies like message processing and queueing are often in the Commodity phase. However, sources of events, such as new devices and data collection tools, are in the Product phase, reflecting their varying maturity levels.

4. Infrastructure: Most flow operations occur in the cloud due to benefits like scalability and reduced friction in development. Thus, infrastructure is placed in the Commodity phase.

Final Model and Next Steps

The final map provides a current view of flow integration needs. The next steps involve exploring technologies that fulfill these needs, focusing on event-driven systems’ architectures and platforms. Future chapters will speculate on the evolution of flow based on the current map and technologies.

Evaluating the Current Streaming Market

The text outlines the importance of understanding streaming architectures and technologies driving their evolution. Three high-level technology categories are identified: service buses, message queues, and message-oriented middleware (MOM). MOM, for instance, facilitates asynchronous communication through message queues, decoupling producers from consumers and providing delivery guarantees.

Overall, the text emphasizes the strategic mapping of value chains to understand the flow and evolution of system components, preparing for future technological advancements in event-driven architectures.

Message queues and service buses play a crucial role in modern distributed systems by decoupling producers and consumers, allowing independent evolution and integration of components. This architecture supports scalability and flexibility, enabling new producers and consumers to be added easily. Pub/sub mechanisms are essential for precise message routing, maintaining their popularity in messaging systems.

Service-oriented architecture (SOA) emerged in the 1990s, introducing service buses to manage complex connections between diverse software components. Enterprise service buses (ESBs) provide a centralized communication platform, supporting data transformation, routing, and process management. However, ESBs face challenges with scalability and performance, leading to their use in specific clusters rather than entire enterprises.

The Internet of Things (IoT) revolutionized data flow through events, with devices using standard networking technologies like TCP/IP. IoT protocols such as MQTT have become pivotal, offering lightweight pub/sub messaging suitable for various applications. MQTT brokers manage message routing between producers and consumers, supporting asynchronous communication.

HTTP and WebSocket are also popular in IoT, albeit with different characteristics. HTTP is a request-reply protocol, while WebSocket enables two-way communication over TCP. Both facilitate point-to-point connections without pub/sub semantics.

Event processing architectures enhance data flow by introducing tools that process event stream traffic. These tools, including functions and real-time stateful systems, allow for quick, reactive event handling. Functions like AWS Lambda simplify attaching code to event streams for tasks like sorting and aggregation.

Overall, these technologies contribute to the development of scalable, efficient streaming architectures, adapting to the evolving needs of distributed systems.

The text discusses the evolving landscape of event-driven and serverless computing, highlighting key technologies and platforms. It begins with the concept of serverless computing, emphasizing services like AWS Lambda that allow developers to focus on unique application code by minimizing operational work. Lambda enables various triggers across AWS services, promoting a wide range of application categories. Competitors like Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform also offer event-driven services.

Low-code and no-code platforms, such as VANTIQ and Mendix, reduce coding requirements by offering visual design for event execution. These platforms often integrate with queueing systems to connect different streaming systems. While currently targeting web and mobile applications, there is potential for growth in event-driven low-code platforms.

Log-based stream processing platforms, such as Apache Kafka, store events in a sequence, allowing consumers to access events based on time or other criteria. Unlike traditional message queues, events are maintained for a specified time, enabling multiple consumers to access different points in the timeline simultaneously. This approach supports event sourcing, where the state of an entity is represented by its stream of state changes, allowing for accurate state recreation and reliability.

Stateful stream processing offers an alternative by maintaining a running model of system state, using concepts like digital twins to represent real-world entities. This model allows for more intelligent processing and holistic system views, as seen in platforms like Swim.ai and EnterpriseWeb.

The text also explores integration architectures, contrasting contextual integration (using connectors for specific functions) with composable systems (allowing flexible, user-defined processes). While connector-based architectures dominate, serverless and event-driven technologies may shift focus towards more flexible integration methods.

Finally, the text speculates on the future of these technologies, using tools like Wardley Maps and Promise Theory to predict evolution and address gaps in current systems. The goal is to understand future requirements and potential developments in event processing and integration.

Overall, the text provides an overview of current trends in event-driven computing, low-code platforms, log-based and stateful stream processing, and integration architectures, while considering future technological advancements.

The text discusses the evolution of flow integration technology, focusing on how event-driven integration interfaces and protocols might become commodity technologies. The concept is explored through Wardley Maps, which help visualize the landscape and climate of technological evolution. The goal is to create a simple way to integrate applications across organizational boundaries using standardized events and protocols.

The author examines how components of flow integration, such as payload data format, metadata format, and discovery, need to evolve together. The idea is that these components must become standardized to make flow integration a commodity. If each provider uses different interfaces, it complicates integration and increases costs, preventing the technology from becoming a standard.

The text introduces “gameplay,” a strategic analysis method by Simon Wardley, which involves exploring different techniques to drive changes in the market using a map of the current landscape. Wardley identified 61 different strategic actions, divided into categories like market differentiation, defensive tactics, and ecosystem development.

Key strategies discussed include:

1. Standards Game: The adoption of standardized event-driven integration interfaces can benefit major technology vendors by simplifying integration challenges. This allows vendors to differentiate based on data and service quality rather than proprietary interfaces.

2. Exploiting Network Effects: As flow adoption grows, businesses can leverage standard mechanisms to serve larger markets efficiently. Entrepreneurs should participate in developing open, scalable event-driven integration specifications to capitalize on market growth.

3. Cocreation: Collaboration among companies to develop and refine flow standards can drive value. Historical examples include the IFX Foundation in electronic payments and OASIS in data automation. This collective effort can lead to widely accepted standards.

The text suggests that the evolution of flow integration will likely involve cooperation among major cloud providers and their partners to address event integration challenges. The emergence of flow standards will be driven by customer demand and the need for seamless integration across platforms.

Overall, the text emphasizes the importance of strategic planning and collaboration in the evolution of flow integration technology, highlighting the potential for standardization to transform the landscape of event-driven applications.

Summary

The text explores the dynamics of technology evolution, focusing on the concept of “flow” in the context of enterprise computing and cloud services. It highlights the challenges and opportunities associated with adopting new technologies, particularly the inertia faced by vendors and enterprises.

Vendor and Enterprise Inertia

• Vendor Inertia: When Amazon Web Services (AWS) entered the market, it faced skepticism from both customers and vendors. Customers worried about data security in shared environments, while vendors saw a threat to their existing business models. This resistance, termed “vendor inertia,” delayed the adoption of public cloud computing by enterprises.

• Enterprise Inertia: Large organizations have complex IT systems, making the adoption of new technologies slow. Typically, technology transitions take about three years: understanding, prototyping, and scaling. This natural inertia suggests mainstream adoption of flow might take five to ten years.

Cloud Providers and Flow

• Cloud Giants’ Role: AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) have developed ecosystems with proprietary protocols, creating resistance to flow adoption. However, these companies are involved in initiatives like the CNCF CloudEvents specification, indicating a shift towards supporting more open integration standards.

• Startups and Telecommunications: Startups might resist open interfaces fearing loss of customer lock-in, but an open ecosystem could expand their market. Telecommunications companies, owning the network “pipes,” could enhance flow adoption by improving network services.

Open Source and Flow

• Open Source Contribution: Open source projects are likely to support flow due to their focus on real-time data and event streams. These projects thrive on developer adoption, aligning with the open architecture that flow promotes.

Challenges and Opportunities

• Security and Integration: Key challenges include ensuring security, performance, and cost-effectiveness. Flow must meet stringent security criteria to handle sensitive data and prove its efficiency and scalability.

• Innovation Potential: The commodification of existing technologies through flow could lead to unpredictable innovation. While it’s uncertain which industries will drive flow adoption, the potential for new applications and services is vast.

Requirements for Flow Evolution

• Standard Interfaces and Protocols: The evolution of flow depends on adopting standard interfaces and protocols. Current messaging and event streaming engines are beginning to support standards like MQTT and AMQP, moving towards greater ubiquity.

• Security Considerations: Security is paramount for flow adoption. Encryption, data provenance, and authorization are critical concerns. Existing standards like TLS provide a foundation, but end-to-end encryption and independent payload encryption are necessary for trust.

In conclusion, while there are significant challenges to overcome, particularly regarding vendor and enterprise inertia and security concerns, the potential for flow to revolutionize integration and drive innovation is substantial. The text suggests that with the right standards and protocols, flow could become a core element of the internet, enabling a wide range of new applications and services.

Summary

In the realm of event-driven systems, ensuring secure and efficient data transmission is crucial. Various protocols like AMQP and MQTT are used for message transmission, often over TLS for encryption. However, these protocols differ significantly, lacking a unified method for encrypted event handling that any consumer application can interpret. The CNCF CloudEvents team is actively working to address this issue by exploring encryption handling in event communication, though encryption is not yet part of their specification.

HTTP, specifically HTTPS, relies on TLS for encryption but faces similar limitations without additional protocols. Companies often implement extra encryption layers for sensitive data, such as credit card information. A future flow protocol might not require explicit encryption support, instead carrying already encrypted data payloads. This approach offers flexibility but may lack optimization.

Connection security is vital to ensure events reach the intended consumers without interception. Protocols like TLS help mitigate man-in-the-middle attacks by using trusted certificate authorities for identity verification. However, TLS alone is insufficient for multi-hop or private network routing. Broker-based protocols like MQTT must find alternative ways to verify broker identities, potentially using encryption key technologies like X.509 certificates.

Data provenance ensures data integrity and authenticity, crucial for mission-critical applications. Current solutions, like checksums or ledger-based approaches such as blockchain, face challenges like performance issues and lack of widespread adoption. An effective solution for maintaining data provenance in fast-paced environments is yet to be developed.

Agility in the World Wide Web (WWF) is essential for adapting to changes while maintaining trust. Loosely coupled interfaces allow independent module modifications, enhancing system flexibility. Composability enables assembling solutions from known building blocks. A loosely coupled flow interface could use messaging-oriented connections, like Synadia’s topic IDs, or REST APIs with standard HTTP commands. The final interface will likely blend these approaches, leveraging HTTP for server location and new mechanisms for streaming connections.

Protocols are key for software integration. A known and predictable protocol ensures reliable data exchange between producers and consumers. This involves understanding event metadata, which provides context and decryption instructions, and the event payload, which contains the actual data. As the field evolves, a standard interface for connecting to unique streams is anticipated, following patterns seen in cloud computing and container management.

Overall, the development of secure, flexible, and efficient protocols and interfaces is critical for the future of event-driven systems, ensuring data integrity, secure connections, and adaptability to changing environments.

Summary

The text discusses the challenges and solutions related to metadata and payload protocols in event-driven systems, focusing on the CNCF CloudEvents specification. This specification standardizes metadata across different protocols like MQTT and AMQP, enhancing interoperability. However, payload protocols are less defined, with most systems allowing flexible payload formats. In the future, common standards may emerge, but their specifics are unpredictable.

The core value of event-driven systems, or “flow,” lies in reducing integration costs and enabling near-real-time state change signaling. Timeliness is crucial, as data’s value diminishes over time. Latency and retention are key elements affecting timeliness. Latency involves network delays, which can be minimized by reducing network hops and using edge computing. Processing latency, caused by multiple event handling steps, can be managed by parallel processing and performance tracking.

Retention involves deciding how long events should remain available. This is complex, as retaining events too long increases storage costs, while short retention may lead to incorrect processing. Simple retention policies may suffice for many use cases, but some require more nuanced approaches.

Manageability of flow systems requires observability and controllability. Observability involves monitoring system operations to identify issues, while controllability allows operators to influence system behavior. Effective observability balances information sharing to maintain security and operational efficiency.

Overall, the development of flow systems involves addressing technical challenges in latency, retention, and manageability to ensure timely and efficient data processing. These systems may leverage edge computing and require careful architectural planning to optimize performance and scalability.

Summary

The text explores the challenges and opportunities in the evolution of event-driven architectures, focusing on flow systems. It discusses the performance measurement of event processing, controllability, memory, intellectual property, and flow pattern challenges.

Performance Measurement: The text suggests that while cloud services provide events around state changes, they lack detailed performance data. It draws parallels with API-based integrations on the web, where services are expected to be reliable without offering extensive operational data. Flow producers might provide operational event streams to signal issues during passive event waiting.

Controllability: In distributed systems, managing failures is as crucial as supporting normal operations. The text compares flow controllability to API operations, where service providers set operational contexts. In flow systems, either producers or flow services might set this context. When issues arise, consumers might need to change configurations or adapt to changes in event packaging. The text highlights the risk of unintended behaviors, like circular dependencies, which can lead to cascading failures. It underscores the importance of mechanisms to track event usage and counter feedback loops, such as circuit breakers.

Memory: Event-driven architectures offer the ability to replay past events, useful for troubleshooting, auditing, and simulation. This capability allows systems to study behavior by replaying events in sequence. The text suggests using event stream history as a form of memory, which could enable new software forms. However, capturing event data adds cost, and not all use cases will require it.

Intellectual Property: Maintaining control over intellectual property (IP) is crucial for flow systems. Accurate data provenance is necessary to ensure data integrity. The text discusses the challenges of enforcing IP rights, drawing comparisons with the music industry’s digital transformation. It suggests that streaming could protect IP by discouraging data repackaging. Monetization schemes integrated into flow interfaces could further enhance data security and commerce.

Flow Pattern Challenges: The text identifies four basic flow patterns: Collector, Distributor, Signal Processor, and Facilitator. It focuses on the Collector pattern, where a single consumer subscribes to multiple producers. The challenge lies in whether consumers or producers should initiate flow connections. Producers typically own the event stream, but consumers might own topics when collecting related events.

Overall, the text emphasizes the need for robust mechanisms to manage performance, control, memory, and IP in flow systems, drawing insights from existing web and API integrations.

Summary of Flow Patterns and Challenges

Emergence of Flow

Flow systems are essential for handling event-driven integration, where producers and consumers exchange data efficiently. The emergence of flow patterns like the Collector, Distributor, Signal, and Facilitator address different integration needs but present unique challenges.

Collector Pattern

The Collector pattern aggregates data streams, such as sales activity for tax purposes, from multiple sources. It must handle potentially millions of simultaneous streams, requiring scalable infrastructure akin to systems used by tech giants like Facebook and Google.

Distributor Pattern

The Distributor pattern broadcasts data to numerous consumers, similar to a stock market ticker. It must manage scaling outputs across geographies, where network latency can be an issue. Edge computing can help by placing data endpoints closer to consumers, reducing latency.

Signal Pattern

The Signal pattern acts like a traffic cop, directing data between producers and consumers. It involves multiple Signal implementations for complex event processing. This pattern may lead to centralized platforms for event routing, though distributed, composable solutions could be more effective.

Facilitator Pattern

The Facilitator pattern matches data producers with consumers, akin to a broker. It requires scalable applications to handle large numbers of transactions, similar to systems used by companies like Uber or Google AdWords. The challenge is ensuring unique transactions without duplication.

Challenges and Opportunities

Flow systems face challenges in scalability, latency, and integration. Edge computing offers potential solutions but shifts some complexity to producers’ infrastructure. Event-driven systems must balance centralized and distributed approaches for optimal efficiency.

Preparing for Flow

Organizations should focus on:

1. Identifying Needs: Recognize areas where real-time processing can enhance efficiency or create new value.
2. Event-First Strategy: Design applications with event-driven integration in mind, especially when external collaboration is anticipated.
3. Standard Participation: Engage in developing flow standards and technologies to stay ahead in the evolving landscape.

Conclusion

The evolution of flow is speculative, influenced by many variables. Organizations should remain flexible and adaptable, preparing for a future where event-driven integration becomes standard. By identifying business needs and adopting an event-first strategy, companies can position themselves to leverage flow’s potential effectively.

Summary

For decades, distributed systems have focused on reacting to events promptly, with high-frequency trading (HFT) systems as early examples. Derek Collison, a technologist in real-time messaging, identifies four basic use case categories for event streaming: addressing and discovery, command and control, query and observability, and telemetry and analytics. These categories help in designing better systems and identifying flow opportunities within IT portfolios.

Addressing and Discovery

Addressing and discovery involve tracking dynamic entities across systems, such as vehicles in logistics or servers in data centers. This process requires coordination across services to assign identifiers and manage entities effectively. Solutions include registration services, where agents signal their presence, and discovery services that monitor networks for agent transmissions. Challenges include handling duplicate discoveries and scaling to meet high rates of agent changes.

Command and Control

Command and control systems, like SCADA in industrial automation, link event sources to decision-making services. These systems orchestrate people, software, or devices to respond to state changes. Approaches include centralized systems that process events in real time and distributed control using edge computing to manage localized event traffic. Edge computing reduces latency and enables scalability by distributing decision-making closer to agents.

Query and Observability

This category involves monitoring individual agents or specific events to understand behavior. It focuses on real-time querying of event streams to gain insights into system operations. The goal is to enhance visibility and responsiveness to changes within specific domains.

Conclusion

Event streaming and messaging are crucial for modern distributed systems, enabling organizations to react quickly and efficiently to changes. By understanding and implementing the use cases of addressing and discovery, command and control, and query and observability, organizations can better integrate event-driven architectures to optimize their operations and prepare for future challenges.

In complex systems, understanding the state and behavior of agents is crucial. This involves querying and observability, where querying requires signals to request specific data from agents, and observability involves passively gathering data. Observability here refers to monitoring specific agents rather than a broad “collect everything” approach. For dynamic systems with numerous agents, using event streams for asynchronous communication can be more effective than traditional APIs. This allows for sophisticated queries and better handling of scale and network challenges.

Event processing systems can sort incoming data into topics for targeted processing, though this may lead to numerous topics. Alternatively, consumers can process a broader stream, filtering out irrelevant data, balancing producer-side and consumer-side processing. Modern platforms like AWS Lambda and Apache Storm offer viable solutions for these needs. Stateful stream processors are emerging as potential tools for observing and processing state data.

Telemetry and analytics focus on real-time insights into system behavior, crucial for applications like real user measurement (RUM) in ecommerce. RUM provides immediate insights into user behavior and campaign effectiveness, offering a competitive edge by allowing rapid response to data. The big data market, valued at $138.9 billion in 2020, encompasses various use cases, including sales and financial analytics, which benefit from near-real-time data processing.

Implementations of query and observability, as well as telemetry and analytics, often resemble Collector or Distributor pattern systems. Stream-based approaches are gaining traction over traditional batch processing, with projects like Apache Flink offering both batch and stream capabilities. Stateful stream processing engines, though still developing, promise to combine analytics with action, potentially using digital twin models for real-time decision-making.

Modeling complex activities using methods like EventStorming helps identify event-driven opportunities. EventStorming involves mapping business processes to event flows, capturing events, influences, commands, and policies. This method reveals organizational workflows and integration points with external systems, highlighting areas for improvement and flow opportunities.

When building systems for these use cases, architecture choices depend on functional, scale, and resilience requirements. Different scenarios require distinct architectures, with messaging and eventing serving different purposes. Eventing broadcasts facts, while messaging involves interaction. Understanding these distinctions helps in selecting the appropriate infrastructure for event-driven applications.

Overall, the focus on real-time data processing and event-driven architectures is crucial for modern businesses to gain insights and respond swiftly to changes, enhancing competitive advantage and operational efficiency.

In building flow-ready solutions for event stream processing, understanding the distinction between messaging and eventing is crucial. Messaging involves a two-way dialogue where producers and consumers coordinate activities, exchanging messages like “task completed.” This requires maintaining state to track conversations, which can complicate scaling. Techniques such as sharding and consensus mechanisms help manage state distribution but add processing overhead and latency, impacting scalability. Edge computing can localize messaging, improving efficiency by isolating message distribution to servers with low-latency connections.

Eventing, on the other hand, is a one-way communication where producers broadcast facts without requiring feedback from consumers. This results in loosely coupled connections, allowing consumers to connect or disconnect without affecting producers. This flexibility encourages innovation by reducing risk. Eventing architectures can handle discrete events, where each event stands alone, or event series, where related events are analyzed together.

For discrete events, producers push events to consumers without additional consumer actions, minimizing promises between them. This allows producers to operate at high scale with minimal effort. Efficient architectures use push models, where producers send events directly to consumers. Consumers can provide mechanisms for receiving events, like Webhooks, which decouple the producer and consumer, enabling independent decision-making.

Event series require a pull model, where consumers retrieve event ranges from producers. Log-based queues like Apache Kafka excel here, maintaining event order and enabling large-scale processing. They support event series analysis by maintaining chronological event history, crucial for pattern recognition and machine learning applications.

Ultimately, choosing between messaging and eventing depends on the integration needs and the desired level of coupling between producers and consumers. Messaging suits scenarios requiring coordination, while eventing supports scalable, loosely coupled architectures. Edge computing and log-based processing are key strategies for optimizing these systems, enabling efficient, scalable event stream processing.

Summary

In the evolving landscape of event-driven architectures, it’s crucial to distinguish between single actions and workflows. Single actions involve discrete events processed by a single function or API call, while workflows require coordination across multiple steps and processors. Understanding this distinction helps developers choose the right architecture, saving time and effort.

Single Actions: These involve routing events to appropriate processors using services like Azure Event Hubs, Google PubSub, AWS EventBridge, or Knative Eventing. Serverless platforms allow developers to deploy functions that respond to events without managing underlying infrastructure. The simplest implementation involves configuring an event router to send events to a queue or directly to a function. For state tracking, stateful streaming platforms like Swim.ai are recommended.

Workflows: These track state across multiple steps and benefit from automation systems like AWS Step Functions or Azure Logic Apps. They simplify process management and allow for integration with third-party services. Workflow engines are ideal for complex processes requiring multiple interdependent actions, such as insurance claims or medical triaging.

Driving Flow Forward: The future of flow involves solving technical challenges like standardizing interfaces, ensuring scalability, security, and discoverability. A marketplace for streams is essential for innovation. Standards bodies like IETF, OASIS, and CNCF play a role in defining protocols, but open-source projects may significantly influence future standards.

Open Source and Standards: Open-source projects, particularly from the Apache Foundation and CNCF, are pivotal in event processing and queuing. Projects like Apache Kafka, Apache Beam, and Argo are key players. Open-source initiatives could define interfaces and protocols for the future Web of Flow (WWF).

Entrepreneurship: There are opportunities in data provenance, event data distribution tracking, coordination platforms, and monetization mechanisms. Entrepreneurs can drive flow forward by creating solutions that meet emerging needs.

Building Flow Networks: The success of flow relies on both the technology providers and the consumers. Businesses, governments, and nonprofits can act as catalysts for flow adoption by creating and consuming event streams.

In essence, the development of flow technologies presents significant entrepreneurial opportunities. By engaging in standards development, contributing to open-source projects, and fostering flow networks, individuals and organizations can shape the future of event-driven architectures.

Summary

The text discusses the importance of establishing common interfaces and protocols for event-driven integration across organizations, drawing parallels with past initiatives like Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in the financial sector. Trade associations and industry groups play a crucial role in creating standards that facilitate seamless data exchange, reducing risks and making commerce more efficient. The insurance and financial industries, for example, have numerous trade groups that work on integration standards.

Participation in existing trade associations can be beneficial for companies aiming to adopt event-driven integration. However, gaining access to decision-making committees can be challenging. Companies not part of trade groups might consider forming new organizations focused on flow standards, especially as new use cases emerge. Government regulations also influence integration standards, acting similarly to trade associations in setting guidelines for product and service integration.

Market ecosystems, where a core vendor enables other vendors to build complementary software, are another avenue for establishing integration standards. Amazon Web Services (AWS) serves as a prime example, having set standards for image packaging, container images, and event formats. Such ecosystems create predictable integration behaviors, reducing development costs for vendors. Dominant vendors can drive others to align with their integration requirements, as seen with Microsoft, Twitter, and Facebook.

Startups often succeed by adding value to existing platform ecosystems, targeting the ecosystem’s customer base. This model benefits both product and service companies. Building a positive feedback loop within the ecosystem can enhance market presence, as seen with Forte Software’s strategy in the 1990s. Companies can also explore existing streams to provide value-added services, though they risk competition from the platform vendors themselves.

Open source alliances are another method to influence and disseminate standards. Running code often defines market adoption more effectively than documentation alone. Open source projects, like Kubernetes or Postgres, could collaborate on consistent interfaces and protocols for event-driven integration. Consistent event processing, as demonstrated by AWS Lambda, encourages automation and integration across platforms. Open source projects can further unify operations by defining flow-compatible streams for infrastructure and application platforms.

The text emphasizes the early stage of event-driven integration moving toward a commodity phase, predicting significant developments in the next three to five years. It encourages stakeholders to recognize the opportunities in this space, highlighting the collective effort required to advance event-driven integration. The discussion aims to inspire software developers, architects, executives, entrepreneurs, and investors to engage in shaping the future of event-driven integration.

The appendix evaluates the current flow market using a Wardley Map model, detailing components like infrastructure and integration. Infrastructure, including cloud services and virtualization technologies, is categorized as a Commodity/Utility, with major providers like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform leading the market. Integration mechanisms require interfaces and protocols to enable event stream flow, with the text noting the distinction between interfaces (interaction points) and protocols (data exchange rules).

Overall, the text outlines the collaborative efforts needed to establish event-driven integration as a standard, highlighting the roles of trade associations, market ecosystems, open source projects, and government regulations in this evolving landscape.

Interfaces and protocols are fundamental to modern APIs like REST and GraphQL, defining data exchanges beyond mere call signatures. Interfaces initiate connections, while protocols manage data streams post-connection. The distinction between them is often blurred. Currently, no standard flow interfaces or protocols exist, but foundational technologies support internet connectivity, crucial for inter-organization communication.

Connection Technologies:

• Internet Protocol (IP): Essential for data routing across local networks, part of the TCP/IP standard, a Commodity/Utility.
• Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and QUIC: TCP manages data transmission within local networks. QUIC, part of HTTP/3, optimizes internet usage and will likely replace TCP for web and streaming applications.
• HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) and Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT): Both are pivotal for IoT streaming. HTTP facilitates web connections, while MQTT supports lightweight, publish-subscribe communication in IoT environments.
• WebSockets: Enables long-term bi-directional internet communication, becoming a Commodity/Utility.
• Synadia NGS: Offers a unique messaging protocol for streaming, not yet a Commodity/Utility but positioned in the Product category.

Interface Flow: Interfaces must locate producers and establish necessary connections. Examples include:

• Kafka Consumer API and Kafka Connect: Widely used for event processing but not yet suitable for general-purpose flow APIs.
• EdgeX API: Simplifies industrial IoT integration but relies on platform-specific mechanisms.
• CNCF Cloud Events Subscription API: Promising for flow, but still in early stages of adoption.

Protocols: Protocols manage data packaging and delivery, ensuring consumers receive intended data. Key protocols include:

• CNCF CloudEvents: Aims to create a universal metadata model adaptable to various protocols, facilitating seamless event processing across platforms. It supports structured (JSON) and binary payloads, making it versatile for different streaming use cases.

Observations: Current technologies like QUIC and NGS show promise for improving streaming connections. However, integration will likely depend on new APIs and flow-centric protocols. Existing interfaces are too complex or specific, lacking a universal flow interface. The CNCF’s efforts are noteworthy but still developing. Synadia’s model offers simplicity, but no current interface achieves the ideal single URI connection method.

In summary, while many components are well-adopted, the future of flow integration will hinge on evolving interfaces and protocols that can universally apply across various streaming contexts. The CNCF CloudEvents and Synadia’s approach could be pivotal in shaping this landscape. However, achieving a seamless, universal flow mechanism remains a work in progress.

Summary

The text discusses various protocols and technologies for event-driven architectures and data flow systems, focusing on their capabilities, adoption stages, and potential roles in future ecosystems.

CloudEvents

CloudEvents is a protocol designed to standardize event metadata across different transport protocols. Released in 2019, it aims to simplify event handling by using a single metadata format. Despite limited adoption, there is optimism about its potential due to interest from various companies. It is currently in the Product phase of development.

NATS

NATS (Neural Autonomic Transport System) is a simple, high-performance messaging protocol. It uses straightforward commands for publishing and subscribing to topics. While its simplicity may limit use cases, it effectively reduces event-passing complexity. NATS is proprietary and remains in the Product phase.

MQTT

MQTT is a lightweight publish-and-subscribe protocol widely used for machine-to-machine communication. It supports features like message expiration and length limits, making it versatile for various applications. Despite limitations in handling large payloads, it is a Commodity/Utility protocol due to its broad adoption.

AMQP

The Advanced Message Queueing Protocol (AMQP) is an open standard for business message exchange, promoting interorganizational integration. It supports multiple streams and connection sharing, treating payloads as opaque binary blobs. AMQP is positioned as a Commodity/Utility protocol.

HTTP

HTTP, a ubiquitous point-to-point protocol, is crucial for internet communications. Although not a publish-and-subscribe protocol, it may play a significant role in flow systems. HTTP’s role will depend on market demands and potential adaptations for publish-and-subscribe methods. It is a Commodity/Utility protocol.

WebSocket

WebSocket facilitates two-way communication over HTTP, making it compatible with existing internet security measures. It supports subprotocols and server-to-client events, making it suitable for flow operations. WebSocket is a Commodity/Utility protocol supported by modern browsers and the IETF.

Observations

The text highlights the abundance of protocols available, each with strengths that could contribute to future flow architectures. Protocols like HTTP, MQTT, and WebSockets may play key roles, potentially unified by standards like CloudEvents. However, no definitive flow-specific protocol has emerged.

Discovery

Discovery is crucial as data streams proliferate. Options include using search engines or programmatic registries to locate and access streams. While public registries have historically struggled, platforms like Vantiq and Solace offer nascent solutions for stream discovery and management. These solutions are in the Genesis stage but may evolve quickly as market needs develop.

Key Promises

• Enable consumers to discover relevant streams.
• Track stream qualities such as URI, event volume, and protocols.

Examples

• Search Engines and Web Pages: Provide a basic method for stream discovery, consistent with the API economy.
• Vantiq and Solace: Offer discovery registries to simplify stream consumption, though not providing an internet-wide view.

Overall, the text underscores the evolving landscape of protocols and discovery mechanisms in event-driven systems, with potential for further development and integration.

The text discusses the development and integration of event-driven architectures, focusing on stream discovery, processing, and sources. Major cloud providers like AWS and Azure are enhancing their services to support event-driven development, with AWS EventBridge and Azure Event Hub offering schema registries for managing publisher-subscriber contracts. AWS EventBridge boasts integration with over 90 external sources, including SAP and Salesforce, but neither service provides internet-wide discovery or flow rate information. The text suggests a potential market for a comprehensive flow discovery service, akin to a “Google for event streams,” which could gain traction as network effects increase.

Interaction technologies are crucial for event streaming, with producers being any digital device or software capable of streaming data. Producers can also process data before streaming it to consumers. Examples include sensors, converters, and agents that collect data from the environment, as well as web, mobile, and desktop applications that transmit user actions and state changes. Public and private data feeds, such as weather services and stock tickers, also serve as sources, though many still operate on a request-response model rather than streaming.

Stream processing is identified as a key area with numerous options available. The text highlights platforms like Apache Kafka, Pulsar, Storm, and Flink. Kafka and Pulsar support log-driven queueing for processing events in historical context, with Pulsar offering faster performance and Kafka providing a mature ecosystem. Storm and Flink support acyclic graph data processing, useful for ETL tasks and transforming data from producers to meet consumer needs.

Overall, the text emphasizes the growing opportunities in event-driven architectures, driven by advancements in technology that enable efficient data packaging, transmission, and processing. Edge computing is expected to further expand the capabilities and variety of data sources, enhancing the potential for new applications and services.

Summary

Stream processing involves managing thousands of events per second, requiring advanced tools and resources. Key technologies in this space include open-source projects like Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar, which are integral to event-driven architectures. These tools facilitate log-based event processing and acyclic graph data processing, providing asynchronous capabilities for reading and writing data streams.

Stream Processing Libraries and Frameworks: Common programming languages now offer libraries and frameworks (e.g., Spring Cloud Stream, Faust) that simplify stream interactions. These tools buffer data in memory, allowing applications to write data from various sources, such as web applications or sensors, to streams. They are expected to evolve into more consumer-friendly tools, expanding the capabilities of flow standards.

Queues and Logs: Queues and event logs are crucial in asynchronous architectures, helping decouple producers from consumers. Queues are transient, holding events temporarily, while logs persist events in a time-series format. Popular message queues like RabbitMQ are adding logging features to enhance their capabilities. Process automation tools from AWS and Azure, such as AWS Step Functions, use workflows to manage event-driven activities, offering flexibility in event processing.

Message Queues: These play a vital role in asynchronous communication across various applications, from financial systems to industrial monitoring. Products like IBM MQ and RabbitMQ provide robust queueing capabilities. Public cloud services, such as AWS SQS and Azure Service Bus, offer managed queue services with different delivery guarantees.

Log-Based Streaming Platforms: Platforms like Apache Kafka and AWS Kinesis capture and store events for later consumption. These services are essential for applications generating high event rates. Kafka is particularly dominant, supported by a wide range of tools and vendors. It ensures events are held and retrievable in order, appealing to enterprise developers.

Consumer Technologies: Consumers use similar technologies as producers to process streams, creating value from events. Stream processing platforms like Apache Kafka and Flink enable rapid manipulation of streams, allowing integration with various endpoints, such as AI models or business applications. These platforms support connectors for direct data transfer between commercial applications, demonstrating their versatility.

Wardley Mapping: Many of these technologies are transitioning from products to commodities, with cloud providers offering utility services. Open-source projects remain central, but managed services are increasingly popular, reflecting the evolution of the stream processing market.

Overall, stream processing is a dynamic field with significant room for innovation, particularly in simplifying and monetizing stream publishing. The integration of advanced processing tools and the rise of managed cloud services indicate a shift towards more accessible and scalable solutions in event-driven architectures.

The text discusses various technologies and platforms used for data processing and event-driven architectures, focusing on their unique capabilities and market positioning.

SwimOS (Swim.ai)

SwimOS is a platform that manages state at scale, useful for scenarios like optimizing city traffic lights by maintaining a live representation of interconnected objects. It builds a graph of “digital twins” to represent objects and relationships in event streams, allowing agents to share state and make decisions. Swim.ai offers commercial support for SwimOS, positioning it between a product and a commodity/utility.

Serverless Event Processing

Major cloud providers offer serverless solutions, such as AWS Lambda, which allows developers to write functions triggered by events without managing servers. AWS Step Functions extend this by enabling process flows with multiple actions. Microsoft and Google provide similar serverless options. These platforms are considered commodity/utility services due to their widespread adoption and ease of use.

Low-code/No-code Platforms

Platforms like Vantiq, OutSystems, and Mendix enable non-developers to assemble applications using predefined parts. They vary from developer-centric tools to visual process assembly tools. The “85% rule” highlights limitations in earlier platforms, but newer mixed-use approaches allow integration with traditional programming for more flexibility. These platforms are still in the product phase.

Reactive Programming Platforms

Reactive programming, supported by frameworks like Spring WebFlux, Akka, and Eclipse Vert.x, focuses on nonblocking, efficient resource usage in stream-based applications. This approach is gaining traction in enterprise software development, with platforms like Lightbend and Netifi emerging to provide additional enterprise features. Reactive programming is still in the product phase.

Sinks in Event-driven Architectures

Sinks are the final processing or storage step in an event stream, handling a variety of tasks from data storage to user interface updates. Common sinks include relational databases and NoSQL stores like MongoDB and AWS DynamoDB. These technologies are mostly in the utility/commodity phase, with some products like Confluence’s KSQL offering specialized features.

Analytics Tools

Analytics tools, such as IBM Data Warehouse and Google Cloud BigQuery, enable historical analysis of streaming data. Cloud providers offer scalable analytics services with pay-per-use models, making them advantageous for enterprises. These tools are mostly considered commodity/utility due to their widespread availability.

Streaming Analytics

Streaming analytics tools, like Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics and Google Dataflow, provide real-time analysis of data as it is received, enabling immediate insights and actions. These tools are essential for industries requiring quick data processing, such as online marketing. Major cloud providers offer robust streaming analytics options, positioning them as commodity/utility services.

Overall, the text emphasizes the evolution and integration of data processing technologies, highlighting the increasing role of open-source solutions and cloud-based services in enhancing flexibility, efficiency, and scalability in event-driven architectures.

Summary

The text discusses the evolution and application of real-time data flow technologies, emphasizing their growing importance in various sectors. Real-time analytics and visualization capabilities are becoming crucial, particularly in event-aware applications that drive rapid responses. Examples include high-frequency trading, connected vehicles, and manufacturing adjustments. These applications often display event data for human interaction, leveraging cloud services to automate responses through functions that react to events.

The text highlights the potential of flow technologies to transform industries by connecting global activities and enabling immediate action. The adoption of standardized interfaces and protocols will allow existing tools to handle new data streams without custom code, enhancing their value. Key to this transformation is the integration of event data into applications that can automatically or manually trigger actions.

The IT world is poised for this shift, with advancements in large-scale data analytics and near-real-time processing tools. However, these tools are not yet fully adapted to flow use cases. As standards develop, more commercial and open-source projects will incorporate flow capabilities.

The document also explores the business case for flow adoption, outlining drivers such as improved customer experience, organizational efficiency, and innovation. It discusses the importance of flexibility in data flow design and the lowering of stream processing costs. The text references various technologies and concepts like APIs, cloud services, and serverless platforms, noting the role of organizations like the Apache Foundation and CNCF in standardization efforts.

Wardley Mapping is used to categorize these technologies, distinguishing between custom and commodity phases. The text predicts the impact of flow technologies on industries like finance, healthcare, and transportation, emphasizing the need for agility, security, and observability.

The document concludes by discussing the future of flow technologies, focusing on standards development, ecosystem partnerships, and the role of open-source projects. It underscores the importance of interoperability and the potential for flow technologies to drive entrepreneurship and new business models.

Overall, the text provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and future prospects of real-time data flow technologies, highlighting their transformative potential across various domains.

The common pandora is a fish that spends its first two years as a female and the third year as a male. Its mating season varies by region, typically occurring from spring to autumn, with some areas having two breeding periods. Females can release between 30,000 and 150,000 eggs. This fish is popular in Mediterranean cuisine. Although classified by the IUCN as a species of least concern, the Archipelagos Institute of Marine Conservation advises responsible consumption, suggesting the selection of sustainably sized fish and avoiding them during the breeding season.

The cover illustration of the book is by Karen Montgomery, inspired by a black and white engraving from “Histoire Naturelle” by Cuvier. The fonts used include Gilroy Semibold and Guardian Sans for the cover, Adobe Minion Pro for the text, Adobe Myriad Condensed for headings, and Dalton Maag’s Ubuntu Mono for code.

O’Reilly Media offers a wide range of resources, including books, videos, and live online training courses, available through their platform. More information can be found at oreilly.com/online-learning. O’Reilly Media, Inc. holds the registered trademark for O’Reilly.

©2019 O’Reilly Media, Inc.